Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs)
PFAS National Environmental Management Plan consultation
The per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) National Environmental Management Plan (NEMP) aims to provide governments with a consistent, practical, risk-based framework for the environmental regulation of PFAS-contaminated materials and sites. The PFAS NEMP is being developed as an adaptive plan, able to respond to emerging research and knowledge.
The National Chemicals Working Group of the Heads of EPAs Australia and New Zealand (HEPA) is developing the plan in consultation with relevant Australian Government, State and Territory agencies. The PFAS NEMP seeks to build a nationally collaborative approach and national consistency in priority areas, allowing for the implementation of actions in a way that becomes ‘business as usual’. The plan is being developed by all jurisdictions and recognises the need for implementation of best practice regulation through individual jurisdictional mechanisms.
The PFAS NEMP is expected to be a reference on the state of knowledge related to the environmental regulation of PFAS. The plan will also represent a how-to guide for the investigation and management of PFAS contamination and waste management, including best practice approaches, which will be called upon to inform actions by EPAs.
This PFAS NEMP Consultation Draft provides some background on the state of knowledge of environmental regulation of PFAS and seeks feedback on experiences and views.
How to make a submission
Comments on the questions in this Consultation Paper are requested by Monday, 25 September 2017. Your feedback will inform the development of the PFAS National Environmental Management Plan, which is expected to be provided to HEPA late in 2017.
If you wish to make a written submission, you may like to use the template provided on the website.
Written submissions can be sent to:
Post: PFAS NEMP Consultation Feedback
c/o- Applied Science Directorate
GPO Box 4395
Melbourne VIC 3001
If you would like to receive email updates on the PFAS NEMP, including details of opportunities for further participation in its development, please email us. at
Your comments will help the National Chemicals Working Group develop the PFAS NEMP. Please clearly state if you would like your contribution to remain confidential. Note that Freedom of Information access requirements will apply to all comments, even those marked and treated as confidential. Accordingly, your comments may be released to the public.
Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) are man-made chemicals that have been used in a range of industrial and consumer products since the 1950s.
PFCs have historically been used in the manufacture of non-stick cookware, in stain protection for fabrics, furniture and carpet, in food packaging and in some types of fire fighting foam. The two most well-known PFCs are PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate) and PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid).
PFCs are being phased out around the world because they do not break down naturally in the environment so can persist for a long time. They have been shown to bioaccumulate up food chains. PFCs enter the body through ingestion, not through skin contact. That means, you need to eat or drink food or liquids containing PFCs in order for them to enter your body.
In 2009, PFOS and PFOA were listed under the Stockholm Convention, which requires participating countries to eliminate or reduce the release of these and other persistent organic chemicals into the environment. Australia is a signatory to the convention.
Due to their wide use and persistence in the environment, PFCs can be found in soils, surface water and groundwater in urban areas in low concentrations. However, where larger quantities of PFCs have been released into the environment, concentrations may be elevated. Whether PFOS or PFOA cause health issues in humans is currently unknown, but evidence from studies in animals shows that there is potential for adverse health impacts on humans.
The South Australian Government is taking a precautionary approach in managing PFCs. A ban on PFCs in fire fighting foam is proposed and consultation on a ban is underway.
The EPA’s role
The EPA has been investigating historical use of PFCs in South Australia to identify any areas where further environmental assessment may be required. Anyone undertaking environmental assessment works in South Australia is required to notify the EPA if PFCs are found under the Environment Protection Act 1993. The Act does not apply to Commonwealth land. Notifications of actual or potential groundwater contamination are listed on the EPA site contamination index.
The EPA will work with owners of any sites where PFCs are identified to understand any potential risks off-site and ensure appropriate steps are taken to minimise any impacts on human and environmental health.
The EPA has conducted a study into PFCs in the marine environment.
Frequently asked questions
PFCs have historically been used in a range of common household products and specialty applications, including in the manufacture of non-stick cookware; fabric, furniture and carpet stain protection applications; food packaging; some industrial processes; and in some types of fire-fighting foam.
Are PFOS/PFOA still used?
PFOS and PFOA have been phased out of use in many applications and replaced with alternative chemicals (some of which are still fluorinated) that are designed to be less of a concern (i.e. less persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic).
What are the risks?
PFCs are of concern around the world because they are not broken down in the environment and so can persist for a long time. Their widespread use and persistence means that many PFCs are ubiquitous global contaminants. In addition they have been shown to bioaccumulate up food chains.
What are the effects on human health?
The Commonwealth Department of Health provides information about the health impacts.
What is known about the area of contamination?
The Department of Defence is investigating contamination from the RAAF airbase at Edinburgh and has held a number of community information sessions. It has yet to confirm whether any contamination has left the site. The EPA will continue to liaise with Defence as further assessment occurs.
What should I do if I am a groundwater (bore water) user?
There are many man-made and naturally occurring contaminants that can affect the quality of groundwater. The EPA advises bore water users to have their bores regularly tested to ensure the water is fit for purpose. In some areas, the EPA advises residents not to use bore water due to other contaminants. Residents in those areas are notified by letter. enHealth will provide guidelines for the levels at which water is safe to drink.